AdSense recommends a plan be about to (last weeks of August 2008) time-out

Filed under: AdSense — Wrote by Lees on Sunday, October 26th, 2008 @ 11:46 pm

Last weeks of August 2008, we recommend suspensive AdSense the plan. This may give putting in recommend advertising to release business to bring a few inconvenience, we express regret here. Google tries hard to provide better advertisement product and experience to release business and ad business all the time, also behave in what evaluate all sorts of advertisement products ceaselessly, once AdSense recommends a plan to be started afresh, we can be in inform everybody for a short while, special acknowledgment everybody releases the support that business works to us and understanding.

Recommend advertisement to putting in AdSense (include Google product to recommend with AdWords ad business recommend advertisement) release trade, suspend bringing inconvenience to you to avoid to recommend a plan, before we suggest you suspend recommending a plan in us, take following operations:

The first pace: Remove next all AdSense to recommend code from your website. Before last in August a week, ask you to recommend all AdSense code is removed from your website, next the advertisement that you can continue to use these sky to go out earn profit.

The 2nd pace: The AdSense before be being replaced with AdSense character advertisement recommends advertisement. If your webpage is current,put in only or advertisement of two AdSense character is unit, we suggest you are in after removing next AdSense to recommend advertisement, in these advertisement put AdSense character on advertisement.

The 3rd pace: The report data that recommends all AdSense saves your computer. AdSense recommends a seminar to be saved in your AdSense account by October. Before we suggest you are by October, back up all recommending report, so that be examined in the future.

If you have other issue, can visit our help center, perhaps visit our official gain customer later.

Thank everybody to use AdSense to recommend all the time very much, also hope everybody continues to use our other ad product, wish everybody everything is successful!
Google AdSense group sincerely yours

Turn from: Admin5

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Response to the DoJ motion

Filed under: Official Google Blog — Wrote by Lees on Monday, December 3rd, 2007 @ 10:12 pm

Posted by Nicole Wong, Associate
General Counsel

In August, Google was served with a subpoena from the U. S.
Department of Justice demanding disclosure of two full months’
worth of search queries that Google received from its users, as
well as all the URLs in
Google’s index. We objected to the subpoena, which started a set of
legal procedures that puts the issue before the Federal courts.
Below is the introduction to our response to the Department of
Justice's motion to the court to force us to comply with the
subpoena. You can find the entire response href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/pdf/Google_Oppo_to_Motion.pdf" >
here. (This is a 25-page PDF file.)

I. INTRODUCTION
Google users trust that when they enter a search query into a
Google search box, not only will they receive back the most
relevant results, but that Google will keep private whatever
information users communicate absent a compelling reason. The
Government's demand for disclosure of untold millions of search
queries submitted by Google users and for production of a million
Web page addresses or "URLs" randomly selected from
Google's proprietary index would undermine that trust,
unnecessarily burden Google, and do nothing to further the
Government's case in the underlying action.

Fortunately, the Court has multiple, independent bases to reject
the Government's Motion. First, the Government's
presentation falls woefully short of demonstrating that the
requested information will lead to admissible evidence. This burden
is unquestionably the Government's. Rather than meet it, the
Government concedes that Google's search queries and URLs are
not evidence to be used at trial at all. Instead, the Government
says, the data will be "useful" to its purported expert
in developing some theory to support the Government's notion
that a law banning materials that are harmful to minors on the
Internet will be more effective than a technology filter in
eliminating it.

Google is, of course, concerned about the availability of materials
harmful to minors on the Internet, but that shared concern does not
render the Government's request acceptable or relevant. In
truth, the data demanded tells the Government absolutely nothing
about either filters or the effectiveness of laws. Nor will the
data tell the Government whether a given search would return any
particular URL. Nor will the URL returned, by its name alone, tell
the Government whether that URL was a site that contained material
harmful to minors.

But, the Government's request would tell the world much about
Google's trade secrets and proprietary systems. This is the
second independent ground
upon which the Court should reject the subpoena. Google avidly
protects every aspect of its search technology from disclosure,
even including the total number of searches conducted on any given
day. Moreover, to know whether a given search would return any
given URL in Google's database, a complete knowledge of how
Google's search engine operates is required, inevitably further
entangling Google in the underlying litigation. No assurances, no
promises, and no confidentiality order, can protect Google's
trade secrets from scrutiny and disclosure during the course of
discovery and trial.

Finally, the
Government's subpoena imposes an undue burden on Google without
a sufficiently countervailing justification. Perhaps the Government
can be forgiven its glib rejection of this point because it is
unfamiliar with Google's system architecture. If the Government
had that familiarity, it would know that its request will take over
a week of engineer time to complete. But the burden is not
mechanical alone; it includes legal risks as well. A real question
exists as to whether the Government must follow the mandatory
procedures of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act in seeking
Google users' search queries. The privacy of Google users
matters, and Google has promised to disclose information to the
Government only as required by law. Google should not bear the
burden of guessing what the law requires in regard to disclosure of
search queries to the Government, or the risk of guessing
wrong.

For all of these reasons, the Court must reject the
Government's Motion.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Additional data switchs for the mainstream

Filed under: Google Blackboard — Wrote by Lees on Wednesday, November 21st, 2007 @ 7:51 pm

Good article is reprinted published on August 1, 2007
Reprint fromWebsite of cereal song Chinese governs a rich settle or live in a strange place

Textual: Supplemental Goes Mainstream
Author: Prashanth Koppula, product manager; Matt Cutts, software engineer

2003, when Gu Ge rolls out additional data result, our advocate webpage of billion of index know exactly about sth. The webpage in compensatory index and advocate the webpage of index is same, but make we can index more webpages. When we provide search result, besides advocate the webpage in index, we can use additional data at the same time. When advocate index is done not have enough when much good outcome, the result of additional data especially useful. With advocate the webpage photograph in index is compared, we have a bit restriction to the capture of the webpage in additional data index. The webpage in additional data often Pagerank is inferior, or their network address is very complex. Because of this complement material (
More introduction
) have a very main effect: Promise our capture as far as possible much relevant content.

Any changes that we make always are emphasized at raising the search of the user to experience. 2006 year since, our canvass the system of capture and index complement material. The system after updating is having more development and lasting index. Additional, we return index to having the URL of more parameter, continue to reduce the restriction of websites of pair of our place capture. The result of these change is, our additional data webpage is newer more comprehensive also. We also devote oneself to to make each inquiry can search compensatory index, show more compensatory results thereby. This function hopeful is in today summer roll out.

Advocate the difference between index and compensatory index can continue to reduce from this. Mix considering existing achievement farther henceforth improve, we decide to be Url mark no longer ” compensatory result ” . And you also can continue as before be updated from Gu Ge and be benefited in wider compensatory index.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Are accent character and interfacial language right what effect does the search produce as a result?

Filed under: Google Blackboard — Wrote by Lees on Wednesday, November 21st, 2007 @ 7:50 pm

On August 15, 2007 morning 01:27:00
Vanessa Fox of the person that publish
Reprint fromWebsite of cereal song Chinese governs a rich settle or live in a strange place

Textual
How Search Results May Differ Based On Accented Characters And interface Languages

When the crucial point statement that contains accent character when search user input, our algorithmic language can consider to include and do not contain the crucial point statement of this stress-mark at the same time. For example, the user was inputted ” M

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Yahoo picture search is already integrated the picture of Flickr

Filed under: Yahoo Search — Wrote by Lees on Sunday, November 18th, 2007 @ 9:40 pm

Last year August when, yahoo English search issued famous Web2.0 website Flickr to undertake abecedarian conformity to its banner, specific reflect even if searching certain keyword (be like ” Photo ” , ” Pictures ” etc) when, can appear in SERPs coping Flickr Shortcut.
Recently, yahoo undertook more thorough conformity to its, in the reference that has included Yahoo picture the search a few pieces of pictures in Flickr directly, and keep synchronous update. (Via Loren Baker) besides in the picture with can many occurrence usually medium Flickr, in Yahoo picture search, want to input the user name of Flickr only, also can examine the picture that this user uploads in Flickr directly.

Had not seen the conformity of this respect at present in Chinese Yahoo search. What can foreknow is, before the Flickr Chinese edition that suits chinese mainland user to use is rolled out, the library of huge natural resources of English edition Flickr joins Chinese Yahoo is the job that finishs impossibly in the search.
All rights reserved, the following statement must make clear with the form of the link when reprinting:
Carry formerly at searching engine periphery

Tags: , , , , ,

Copyright © 2007 Google Adsense College.
Powered by GoogleSchool. All Rights Reserved.