Of SNS a few discuss
I wrote SNS howAfter one article, of DaNmarner leave a message a few issues that the reflection that makes me farther concerns SNS, of course I am to had used a few SNS to serve, for instance Facebook, linkedin. I should fill every SNS website individual data, resemble acquiring an university as a child in home, countless fill in time is wasted like resume. Next I am to ramble commonly circuit, see this website whether I deserve lingering place, perhaps deserve the place that comes again after me. And the result always goes up 34 times, also did not go again. DaNmarner is below leave a message, leave a message in the light of his, I also have a few returns, write below, mark with inclined body.
Doubt
SNS and rich guest are disparate phenomenon. Former those who emphasize is efficient mutiple level communication is interactive, with IM even Email is different, this kind of communication is based on actual and human relation. The more that rich guest represents under photograph comparing is independence and freedom, come out from traditional website development, those who emphasize is the issuance of information. At this o’clock I agree with your view basically, but IM and Email also are based on actual and human relation, I never can add the IM contact of any people that I do not know, self-invited contact is added metropolis by screen. Email connection, if do not have a bit relation, perhaps have nothing to do with me, can enter Spam folder directly. Rich guest stresses the expression of individual viewpoint.
What does SNS have to use? IM, rich guest, forum, community, mail group even when the function of the phone can be together centrally, does this problem calculate do not calculate solved? Who can replace IM with SNS, who can use the rich objective of SNS, more do not talk to go up forum community. When whats resemble SNS, with respect to what not be.
The open character of SNS decided it won’t ” replaces ” , however ” integrated ” , after the truth appears like the PC mail, cable, phone, TV, the radio was become by conformity ” multimedia ” is same. Google expends act of Zhou Zhang that rolls out OpenSocial to wait a moment greatly in the light of Facebook, why? Because Facebook is its genuine menace, it is changing the life of people like Google. Of SNS open the development interface that just opens oneself, facilitate tripartite offers a service to perhaps apply, and did not open user data, this namely the user must want to repeat in each SNS websites register, and cannot the actual state that interconnection each other tells. If the user was tired of the word that rushs about between each SNS websites, they or meeting return to his Blog, because this is this place. Comfortable and comfortable.
SNS how gain, ah. If it holds out the advent that is less than spring, wait for the season that is less than results, so enough in the winter allow its eternal sleep.
What does SNS have to be worth the content that reads? Why to have a look personally? Email/IM/ mobile phone / rich guest, which cannot use gab egg? In which hand in most user be those who use gab egg? Without the user of these gab eggs, the tripartite of two hundred and seventy-six million four hundred and forty-seven thousand two hundred and thirty-two Facebook that which come to Where is the profit of a huge sum of order company? Another perspective will see this problem: The motive that Unix/C language invents at first also is to play a game, visible gab egg is a very significant issue. Yes, want to see ability can be experienced really personally, to me character, I often see those newly emerging things, I also like to try new thing, but there always is a result after the attempt, always what did not come to its is forecast, to SNS my forecast not hopeful, this also is the cold water that sprinkles to SNS upsurge.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment this post.